Physical AI & robotics
Open robot models, vision-language-action (VLA) models, embodied agents, ROS/ROS 2, perception, manipulation, navigation, simulation-to-real transfer, and physical safety testing.
Syntony brings independent specialists into confidential, project-based adversarial evaluations when an engagement needs deeper technical, policy, or strategic expertise.
Our red team
Experience across research, engineering, security, and adversarial evaluation.


Experience includes employment, consulting, and external red teaming.
Syntony runs adversarial evaluations for frontier labs, public-sector organizations, and companies deploying AI. The Trusted Red Team Network lets us assemble specialists when an engagement requires expertise beyond the core team.
The network is project-based and confidential. We select specialists based on the engagement's needs and work they can demonstrate.
Each engagement has a specific threat model. Responsibilities and the final deliverable are agreed before work begins.
An engagement may combine technical and policy specialists when a finding needs both forms of analysis.
Findings are documented with the evidence and context needed for the client's review and control process.
Engagements run under NDA. Within those limits, methods and evidence should support independent review and reproduction.
We're recruiting specialists to red team embodied AI systems, particularly open robot models. Experience with robotics stacks, real-world deployment constraints or model-to-action failure modes is most relevant. We also accept applications in the domains below for future projects.
Open robot models, vision-language-action (VLA) models, embodied agents, ROS/ROS 2, perception, manipulation, navigation, simulation-to-real transfer, and physical safety testing.
Telecommunications, network security, industrial control systems, operational technology, connected devices, and security of infrastructure that interacts with AI-driven systems.
Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives risk assessment, dual-use misuse pathways, domain-specific safeguards, and responsible safety evaluation.
Election infrastructure, voting-system security, civic information environments, influence operations, and adversarial assessments of election-related AI risks.
AI-related risks to children, exploitation prevention, age-appropriate safeguards, online safety, and evaluation of model or agent behavior in sensitive contexts.
Model-level attack research and robustness evaluation for frontier or production systems, including analysis of possible defenses.
Systematic testing for prompt injection and jailbreaks, with enough documentation to reproduce a bypass and identify the broader failure mode.
Analysis that connects a technical finding to policies, decision rights, controls, and practical remediation.
Research on how state behavior and compute supply chains shape the security consequences of AI deployment.
Analysis of how technical failures interact with organizational processes and operating conditions during deployment.
Evaluation of permissions, tool use, memory, delegation, and recovery in systems that can act on their environment.
Applications are reviewed on a rolling basis, and we respond to each submission.
Tell us about the system and the decision ahead. We aim to reply within two business days.